Martingale vs Anti-Martingale vs fixed auto-cashout at 1.20x
This is the head-to-head comparison promised in our crash strategy pillar. We tested three systems at a 1.20x auto-cashout with the same $500 bankroll and $10 base bet, over 10,000 simulated sessions each.
Why 1.20x?
1.20x is one of the most-searched targets because it “almost always” lands. At 97% RTP:
- P(reach 1.20x) = 0.97 ÷ 1.2 = 80.8%
- Profit per win: $2 on a $10 bet
- Loss per miss: $10
So you need five wins to cover each loss, and five wins in a row at 80.8% happen only about 34% of the time.
The three systems
- Fixed: bet $10 every round.
- Martingale: after a loss, multiply the bet so one win recovers the loss. At 1.20x pure doubling doesn’t recover the loss (a $20 bet only wins $4), so true 1.20x Martingale needs ×6 escalation. Our simulator uses classic doubling, which recovers only partly at low targets. That makes the “recovery” weaker than people expect.
- Anti-Martingale: after a win, the next bet is the full $12 returned; reset after three wins or any loss.
Results
| System (1.20x, 100 rounds) | Median | 10th pct | 90th pct | Bust rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed | $472 | $412 | $532 | 0% |
| Martingale (doubling) | $472 | $368 | $542 | 0.5% |
| Anti-Martingale (3-win cap) | $465 | $388 | $535 | 0% |
Crash Game Guide simulator, 10,000 sessions each, 3% edge, fixed seed. Run your own above or in the simulator.
What the numbers say
- The median loss is roughly the same because each system wagers a similar total, and the edge takes 3% of it.
- Martingale widens both tails. Its bad sessions are worse than flat betting ($368 vs $412), its good sessions are slightly better, and it carries a small chance of losing everything.
- Anti-Martingale keeps losses capped at one base bet per cycle. At 1.20x the streak bonus is small, because three wins only grow a $10 stake to $17.28.
Verdict
At 1.20x, flat betting is the most reliable default. Martingale’s 0.5% bust rate looks tiny, but it is a total loss, and over a year of sessions it becomes likely. If you want some upside, Anti-Martingale is the safer way to get it. Read the deep dives on Martingale, Anti-Martingale and fixed cash-out targets.
Strategy simulator
- Median final bankroll
- Unlucky (10th percentile)
- Lucky (90th percentile)
- Chance of going bust
- Median max drawdown
- Average rounds played
Example: 1000 sessions of 100 rounds, bankroll $500, base bet $10, target 2x, 3% edge
| Strategy | Median final bankroll | Unlucky (10th percentile) | Lucky (90th percentile) | Chance of going bust |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martingale (double after loss) | $460 | $0 | $1,020 | 46.5% |
| Anti-Martingale (double after win, reset after 3) | $460 | $210 | $720 | 1.1% |
| Fixed bet | $480 | $360 | $600 | 0.0% |
Run it a few times with different settings to find the approach that fits your bankroll and playing style.
Top crash games
Frequently asked questions
Is 1.20x a good auto-cashout?
It's a low-variance target: it wins about 81% of rounds at 97% RTP. It isn't more profitable than any other target. Each loss cancels five wins.
Which system is best at 1.20x?
On average none of them. Flat betting has no escalation risk. Martingale smooths the median but adds rare total losses. Anti-Martingale adds upside from streaks while keeping each loss to one unit.
By Daniel Foster · Crash Game Maths & Mechanics Analyst
Daniel focuses on the mathematics and mechanics behind crash games. His reviews examine RTP disclosures, volatility, multipliers, game mechanics and the mathematical principles behind different crash titles.
Fact-checked by Alex Morgan
Published · Updated
Comments
No comments yet. Start the conversation.